In the latter version of my previous article, I shared this video comparison:
https://rumble.com/v1jxhwz-side-by-side-comparison-of-two-911-videos.html
Here is a screen shot showing the two videos stopped at the same moment in time, which you can tell by comparing the smoke formation:
I posted an early version of that video on Facebook and it stirred up quite the conversation. I am not sure how much of it you will be able to see, but check it out if you’re interested:
https://www.facebook.com/1189063417/videos/831076337892619/
I have decided to do another comparison. We are going to compare two photos of two buildings we were told were struck by two different commercial airliners on the same day.
I believe this first photograph is of the South Tower. I found it via an image search, but the source web page no longer exists. I have annotated it with comments.
We’ve seen the videos over and over. We’ve seen the plane cut into this building.
Looking closely at this photo, the wings of the plane sliced through beams and/or columns. We know the WTC towers were encased in steel beams. I am pretty sure the floors were steel reinforced concrete slabs. I also believe the hole in this photo spans multiple stories of the South Tower.
If you look closely just above the thin slice made by the right wing, you can see beams bent outward rather than inward.
As unbelievable the claims are to me, this photo does seem to represent the claim. As Dr. Judy Wood says, it is indeed a plane-shaped hole.
Now let’s look at the Pentagon.
This photo was taken after the plane struck the building, but before that section of the building collapsed. I found this photo here:
http://911review.com/articles/stjarna/eximpactdamage.html
The white and black annotations on the photo itself were made by someone else, as you’ll see if you visit the site above. I added the pink boxes and arrows and the text around the outside of the image.
That hole, which we can’t see through the smoke, is said to be 18’ in diameter (in a different photo from that same site).
Note the damage they claim was created by the left wing. Funny, the wing didn’t slice through this wall; it didn’t even dent it! Since the wing didn’t enter the building, where is it? That lower left debris doesn’t look like the remnants of a wing to me.
If that wing was that low to the ground (12 feet?), then the whole plane was literally just above the ground when it hit. So how are those two vehicles just sitting there? Why aren’t they totally smashed, managed, and destroyed? And that fence below the left wing? How is that still standing? The engines sat below the wings. The engines would have taken out the fence and the autos and would be sitting in view of this photo, wouldn’t you think?
Yes, these were two different incidents. Two different planes hitting two different buildings in two different cities. However, if you were NOT told (repeatedly for 20 years) what happened, if you were simply shown these two photos, would you believe the same thing happened to both buildings?
I am not telling you what DID happened. I am asking you what YOU think happened based on your OWN understanding of this physical reality and what your OWN eyes are seeing.