If we are truly being honest with ourselves, there is little proof of any claims being made by the governments or corporate news media.
For you to have proof, you have see with your own eyes. This means you have to have evidence, you have to examine that evidence, and you have to apply logic and reason to that evidence. And even, after all of that, you still might not have proof.
Let’s consider COVID. Have you seen the virus? Can you prove that a mask kept it from entering your nose or mouth? Do you see clumps of viruses gathering on the outside of your mask, but not on the inside of it? Have you seen COVID leave one person’s mouth and enter another’s? Have you seen it lingering on surfaces? Do you see it floating in the air of your car?
Now let’s consider evidence. Have you gotten sick a short while after spending time with someone who got sick right after you were with them? Ah, many of you can say yes! So many people have had this experience. But so many people have had the opposite experience as well.
This year, I was in a truck (for nearly an hour) with a woman who got sick days afterward. I was in my truck with that same woman after she was sick and before she got sick again. I hugged her. I spent time with her in her home. I helped her with chores. And I did NOT get sick.
Another time, I visited my best friends. One had been sick for a week. He tested positive (whatever that means). His wife was not sick (yet). I hung out with them—outside and inside. I hugged both of them. And I did NOT get sick. The wife, 2 days later, did get sick...and it took her a week or so to fully recover.
My friends could logically and theoretically trace the believed cause of their illness. They had contact with a man who wasn’t feeling well. That man got sick the next day. Then my friend got sick 2 days later. And then his wife got sick a week after that.
This seems to match what the narrative claims. The “virus” story appears to fit. The evidence and logic we apply is sound. Doesn’t mean a virus was necessarily involved. Doesn’t mean it wasn’t.
Far too many people use the 2nd example to prove the first. This is NOT science. This is theorizing. Theorizing is what happens BEFORE science begins. One starts with a theory, then sets out to disprove it. If they cannot disprove it, they might consider it proven...it depends.
In a recent debate, were Patrick Gunnels questioned whether viruses have ever been proven to exist, Steve Kirsch, at one point, replied with, “Well what got my wife sick, which then got me sick? What killed all of those people?”
https://rumble.com/v1d5ol3-steve-kirsch-joins-to-discuss-pathogenic-viruses.html
First, Steve’s questions are irrelevant to the topic at hand. Second, questioning one theory doesn’t require stating an alternative. That’s not Science. That’s a weak debate technique for deflecting the issue. Patrick wants to see PROOF that viruses exist. He claims there is none. Thus, to refute him, you MUST provide PROOF. If you cannot show him legitimate scientific proof, then you have not refuted his claim, you supported it! Doesn’t mean Patrick is right. Doesn’t mean he isn’t. Only ACTUAL PROOF can decide it.
The point remains that nothing even close to really strong evidence exists regarding COVID, let alone proof. No government has yet to verify possession of a sample of the virus. (Eric’s latest article discusses this.)
Furthermore, an overwhelming amount of evidence actually goes completely against the narrative we’ve been force fed. Some Doctors are now drawing very different conclusions based on that evidence.
https://rumble.com/v1en3fl-dr.-mike-yeadon-concludes-respiratory-viruses-do-not-exist.html
A longer version of the above, in audio only form, can be found here:
https://planetwaves.fm/pfizers-mike-yeadon-the-benefit-of-the-doubt/
If you prefer to watch them speak, I believe this is the full video:
My intention is to navigate the middle: I want to provide just enough evidence to garner your attention and interest, but I do not want to spoon feed an audience, because that is how we got in trouble with all of this. In order for anyone to navigate the storm, they have to be willing to question information (from all sources) and do a little bit of investigating.
My unique perspective is navigating the space between evidence and proof. I have lived my entire adult life there. If you have read my previous two articles (or my metaphysical blog) you know what I mean. This is what I would like to help others do for themselves—not just about the news, but about everything.
I do not try to prove my experiences to anyone, but I do share them often. I HAVE and DO apply logical to all of my beliefs about my experiences. I question theories and look for repeating cases.
Psychism is tricky. I cannot sit here, focus, and repeatably and accurately predict what will occur 2 hours from now. It doesn’t work that way. I can do a Tarot card reading on a specific subject. I can see future potentials through the cards. But it is not science. It is nuance. I might interpret the cards wrong. I might get confirmation or understanding after the fact.
Furthermore, even if a potential is coming, it is REALLY hard to know WHEN. In my opinion, potentials manifest based on conditions, not time.
When I work with clients, my view of the future is accurate WAY more than it is off. To this day, that still amazes me.
Regarding information, there isn’t enough time in a day to read everything. Besides, I am just not interested or drawn to some things. But one thing I do NOT do is hide from information. I may choose not to read this article or watch that video because it doesn’t feel right or because I am not inclined, but I don’t outright refuse a piece of information just because it goes against something I thought was true.
And yet all of those authoritative sources have been asking you to do just that. They censor, they ban, they criticize, they defame. And if you question anything I state, just consider Qanon.
My simple take is this: if you have not read the Q posts, then you don’t have an opinion on them. You think you have an opinion because you’ve been told by the Matrix what you’re supposed to think about them. But if you have not read them with your own eyes...if you have not investigated them with your own logic, then you do not have an opinion.
Back to COVID.
The mainstream told you there was a pandemic: planet wide. And yet no countries reported significant increase in death in 2020.
The mainstream told you vaccines are safe and effective, and yet now athletes are falling dead, SADS (Sudden Adult Death Syndrome) is rampant, the leading cause of death in some places is listed as Unknown, live births are way down, and children and babies are dying of heart-attacks. None of this is happening to the unvaccinated...as far as I can tell.
Furthermore, the document released by the FDA shows us the KNOWN side effects. Here is a screen shot of one page:
Take note of the highlighted item. Look into it if you’re curious.
The mainstream is clearly running defense. So many news articles are simply ridiculous. Logic people. Apply logic!
So, one living inside of the Matrix will refute every bit of evidence I show. The two most popular canned and conditioned responses are: 1 – That’s a conspiracy theory; or 2 – I don’t believe that.
However, these very same people consume nothing but the matrix. 100% of their news comes from “trusted sourced” such as CNN, NYT, NPR, and Facebook fact checkers.
And yet, those trusted sources told you that HCQ and Ivermectin would kill you. [Even water will kill you if you consume FAR too much of it!]
They told you Donald Trump colluded with Russia.
They told you Hunter Biden’s laptop was Russian disinformation.
They told you the 2020 election was the safest and most secure in history.
This one specific case still cracks me up. Rolling Stone, a “trusted source”, published an article stating that gunshot victims were unable to get medical attention because a particular hospital in Oklahoma was overrun with Ivermectin overdoses. They even showed a picture of people waiting in line outside.
Now that looks like evidence, until you apply logic. The article was published in the SUMMER (September 2021). Here is an early version via the way back machine:
The people in line wore winter coats! Look!
If you do a reverse-image search (using the “trusted source” of Google) you will find that this photo was previously used in January of that year:
Those bundled up people were queuing for COVID vaccines. And it wasn’t a hospital, but a church. Furthermore, the hospital itself refuted the claim.
That, my dear friends, is not misinformation. That is straight up disinformation. In other words, it was a blatant lie. Now why would you EVER trust Rolling Stone again?
And yet that fake news article WENT VIRAL! A friend shared it on Facebook…and in fact it is still in her news feed as of today! Facebook fact checkers didn’t check THAT fact! Neither did she.
Until a person is willing to question what is unproven and/or illogical, they will never loosen the grips that the matrix has on them. Unfortunately, most people inside the matrix have been trained to disregard logic altogether.
Don’t believe me? Then explain the requirement to wear a mask from the front door to your table at a restaurant.
The room is filled with people, sitting at their tables, unmasked, and yet you are required to don one in order to enter the premises?
One time, I was two feet from the front doors, which were propped open. At the time I walked in, there was not one person in the cafe wearing a mask. The clerk was outside, and everyone seated was unmasked.
Right when the clerk walked in from outside, he authoritatively told me I wasn’t allowed inside without a mask. My initial response was to look at the dozens of people, inside, without masks. I then turned on my heels, took two steps, and was outta there.
I chose to not spend my money at that establishment.
In science, the burden of proof is on those making a claim, not on those QUESTIONING the claim. If you say, “masks work,” you need to prove it.
No government has proven shit about COVID. Not one thing has been proven. And they SHUT DOWN the world over this! Since then, they simply ban, block, censor, shadow-ban, or label every bit of evidence that goest against their claims. And the arrogant brainwashed attack dogs echo and push those same claims...with ZERO actual evidence and DEFYING logic...even willing to attack their family and friends over it.
For pure entertainment, allow me one last anecdote.
One day a three months ago, I mouthed off on Facebook. After reading an article on the subject, I posted this: “The Australian Mob Regime just outlawed growing one’s own food.”
This is verbatim a response that I received:
“…as someone living in Australia I can say a) there is no such law even proposed in Australia, b) 2014 New Zealand’s food bill has been misinterpreted to state your misinformation, c) learn to critically engage with the content you’re posting before you spread false information (i.e., lies about the wrong country) and d) take a geography lesson to learn the difference between Australia and New Zealand.”
Let’s consider each of his points:
a) Claiming something does NOT exist is very easy to refute. I did so by suppling a link to an AUSTRALIAN government page:
https://www.legislation.vic.gov.au/bills/Agriculture-Legislation-Amendment-Bill-2022
One could say my INTERPRETATION was incorrect. You could say it didn’t pass yet. You could say it was just for one state in Australia. But to say no such thing exists? Well that is just stupid. Unless you REALLY do know EVERYTHING about the country you live it, it is just plain dumb to make such a sweeping claim.
b) I said nothing about New Zealand. He assumed this and was completely wrong in his assumption.
c) While in general, this statement could be helpful, he was completely hypocritical as he failed to follow his own guidance. Furthermore, he again, assumed my claim was false, when he didn’t even know what I was talking about. And he assumed I was talking about “the wrong country,” which I wasn’t.
d) And this is simply the very immature ad hominem attack, which is so common these days. He insults my “lack of knowledge” based on his false assumption. Turns out, he was the one with the lack of knowledge.
This interaction was the FIRST TIME I heard from him in 15 years! I had similar attacks from other people from my distant past.
I readily admit that my rant on Facebook was rash and lacking in substance. My interpretation of the bill was based on the article I had read. I admittedly did not read the bill itself (at first). I didn’t do my homework. However, after looking it over, I still found the bill VERY BAD and TOTALLY overreaching...what one would expect out of an authoritarian regime, not a so-called democracy!
This person’s attack is what is promoted by the satanic controlled media that has been gaslighting their respective populations for years now. The media does this CONSTANTLY, and thus people now do this to their friends.
That’s OK, because the interchange is there for all to see. Awake people can draw their own conclusions from it.
Be an awake person...not a brainwashed attack dog.