Friday evening, Eric Francis Coppolino aired an interview he did with Roland Angle, chairman of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, which you can find here:
https://planetwaves.fm/september-11-incident-roland-angle-ae911-truth/
I listened to the interview, and later commented on Eric’s substack, which you can find here:
I want to share pieces of this interaction, and then add further context for my readers.
During the interview, Roland discussed the possibility of DEWs being used as part of the collapse of the Twin Towers. In response, Eric asked, “Why do we even need to go there?” He then went on to reiterate what was being discussed, namely that controlled demolition was adequate to describe the collapse of the buildings.
I readily admit that I may have misinterpreted Eric’s position. And because that is not at all the point of this article, I will mostly share only those excerpts of what I wrote, which build up to a point I will make later.
My first comment included this:
“...regarding the possibility that DEWs were used on 9/11. The A&E theory may be able to explain the collapse of the buildings, but it does not address other evidence, such as columns disintegrating in mid air
[watch this video:]
and the fact that the majority of the mass of the buildings never struck the earth (as would be measured by devices that detect earthquakes), which would have destroyed that bath tub.
Furthermore, it is so very interesting that cars that were toasted on FDR drive, far away from the WTC, look nearly identical to cars in Lahaina. Have you seen the recent videos comparing the two scenes?
An inside job is one thing. It would explain a certain level of corruption. But if DEWs were in fact used 22 years ago, that reveals a massive change to the story. It would indeed open Pandora's box, which I expect to be opened regardless in the coming years.”
Now, if you are wondering where I got much of the data I shared above, it is from Dr. Judy Wood. I read her book Where Did the Towers Go?
https://www.amazon.com/Towers-Evidence-Directed-Free-energy-Technology/dp/0615412564
You can watch a 2+ hour presentation she made on the subject here:
In a second comment, I wrote this:
"To me, there is a need to [discuss the possibility DEWs were used in the attack]. There are questions that are unanswered by the other theories and it can't be ruled out, especially that we NOW KNOW DEWs exist; we know what companies hold patents for the various technologies, they even advertise the technologies on their web sites.
I'm not sure how things have evolved over the past number of years, but I know that Dr. Judy Wood was shunned by nearly everyone in the 9/11 truth community early on, and having read her book carefully (and with an engineering degree of my own), I found that unwarranted.”
Here is an example of a company advertising Directed Energy technology on their website:
https://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-us/capabilities/directed-energy.html
And here are other websites on the subject:
https://www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/directed-energy-weapons-market/companies
https://www.fortunebusinessinsights.com/directed-energy-weapons-market-104063
And here is a patent easily found on a specific technology:
https://patents.google.com/patent/WO2016024265A1/en
In a third comment, I wrote this:
‘To me, the question, "Were actual passenger jetliners a part of the 9/11 attacks?" equates to the question, "Was covid an actual disease caused by sarscovII?"
The question, "Were DEWs used to dustify the WTC while it collapsed or perhaps to create the collapse?" equates to, "Do viruses exist?"
Most can't even approach these deeper and broader questions until they've accepted the more basic evidence showing the main stream narrative as being false.’
In response to the above, Eric asked me to write “an accurate, fully-sourced paragraph about DEWs and the World Trade Center.” He wanted the paragraph to “account for the fact that they exist (with at least two sources), where one would be mounted, how we know that was there and that it was used, how it was powered, the type of weapon or device, and conclude for sure, as a matter of *attributed* fact, that it was used.”
Boy would it be amazing if I could easily do that. But that is not my point. That is not my skill. That is not my work. And that is not my calling.
I am not here to prove anything to anyone. Yes, I certainly sound that way often enough, but my greater purpose, and what I consider a part of my calling, concerns inspiring others to expand their thinking and perception.
I cannot prove that DEWs were used, not in NYC on 9/11 and not in Lahaina, Maui. What I can do is encourage people to be both open to the idea (open-minded) while also being skeptical (not too eager to accept as fact). I am not an authority. I don’t want people to just believe me. I also don’t want them to simply believe anyone else. And to dismiss information because it is labeled as “Conspiracy Theory” is sometimes dangerous (covid vaccines are proving this).
In a presentation, an architect or engineer stated that controlled demolition was the only known way to take down buildings at near free fall speed. The admitted word I highlight is: known.
In September of 2001, we (or I should say “I”) didn’t know DEWs existed. I do know about them now. I cannot authoritatively say much about them without reading material anyone else can also read. I have taken in a lot of information given to me by others, but to you, that is all hear-say.
In Judy’s presentation I cited above, she explains her investigative process right in the first few minutes. She states that you don’t start with a theory; you start with an observation of the evidence; and, in her (and subsequently my) observation, the buildings did not collapse. I didn’t notice that at first.
So, if they didn’t in fact collapse, to explain how the buildings could have collapsed is the wrong investigation.
I have spent much of my spare time mental energy in this lifetime thinking about the metaphysical, the non physical, that which is beyond the tangible realm that we live in. I have received messages from people who have passed on. I have had numerous premonitions manifest within a week or two years later. I have, through divination readings, accurately described to a client what was coming. I can (and have!) written books using my own personal data.
I cannot prove any of this to you. I don’t need to.
I can tell you anecdotal experience after experience to increase the possibility that you will open up to the ideas I share, but I can’t convince you.
The observation of your own experiences can do that.
I do not know, for certain, that advanced weapons were used on 9/11. I cannot say, for certain, whether actual passenger jet liners crashed into the Twin Towers.
I produced this video last year as part of my own exploration: https://rumble.com/v1l35wf-comparing-8-videos-from-nyc-on-9112001.html
I can tell you that to my educated logical mind, the videos we have been shown are fake. A hollow aluminum plane wing cannot slice through steel...unless something more advanced was also used. Jet fuel will not melt steel unaided. Steel beams do not disintegrate into dust.
Regarding the Pentagon, we saw nearly no evidence of a plane whatsoever. They didn’t even show us fake videos. In fact, their refusal to show us any video evidence is suspect.
I wrote this article last year comparing to two stories we were fed that day:
Who wins for faking the counter narrative? Well, specific individuals do make money lying to people. So yes, people can gain in that way.
But who wins from the main stream narrative? Oh, that list is much, much larger. Not only did many people win from 9/11, they won, in at least one case, billions (research Larry Silverstein)!
I am not an authority. I cannot tell you what is true, what is real, and what you should or shouldn’t do. I can advise (especially when I have some data to share...or when I can do a reading for you).
I will end with this, to help you understand why I am passionate about this topic.
On 9/8/2001, I was walking the streets of NYC having just arrived from Washington DC (by train). That afternoon, I had a strong psychic pulling. It wasn’t a clear message. What I felt was akin to someone pulling back on my shoulders.
When I turned around, I had a clear view of the Twin Towers staring back at me. I literally experienced them as conscious beings. I felt, in that moment, that they were aware of me and wanted to tell me something. I voiced, out loud, “What?” but I didn’t hear a response.
Three days later, I understood what they had said to me: “Take a good look us. We will not be here much longer.”
As a boy who grew up near NYC, I had a personal (iconic) relationship with those buildings. I had never been inside of them, but I had seen them all of my up bringing: frequently on TV, but also in person. The truth about what happened there on Sept 11, 2001 matters to me, even if it doesn’t matter to you.
I highly recommend Eric’s work.